What Is the Role of an Outcry Witness in Proving the Continuous Sexual Abuse of a Young Child?
The Houston Court of Appeals' ruling in Fernandez v. State provides clear definitions of what role an outcry witness can play in proving allegations of continuous sexual abuse of a young child.
June 28, 2023 at 11:46 AM
8 minute read
Expert OpinionThe Houston Court of Appeals (First District) recently heard Fernandez v. State. Its ruling provides clear definitions of what role an outcry witness can play in proving allegations of continuous sexual abuse of a young child. Tex. Code Crim. Pro art. 38.072, Section 2 has come to be known as the "outcry statute." It creates an exception to the hearsay rule in cases involving allegations of sexual assault of a child who is younger than 14 years of age. Pursuant to that statute, a trial court may admit a child/complainant/victim's out-of-court statements that describe the alleged offense suffered by the child, provided that such statements were made to the first adult person to whom the child made a statement regarding the offensive conduct. There may be more than one outcry witness, provided that said witnesses testify about different events. In order to qualify for the outcry witness hearsay exception, a party offering an outcry statement must provide written notice to the opposing party in which the party who intends to offer such evidence identifies the name of the outcry witness(es), including a summary of the witness(es)' testimony. Tex. Code Crim. Pro art. 38.072, Section 2 (b)(1).
Aaron Philip Fernandez was charged with the continuous sexual abuse of his stepdaughter, who was 12 years old when Fernandez was alleged to have begun abusing the girl. The child victim described numerous different instances of sexual abuse by her stepfather over a period of time of 30 or more days, including specific offenses or acts of indecency with a child, between July 17, 2017, and Oct. 31, 2017. On or about Feb. 21, 2018, the child, identified as "K.V." made an outcry to John Laymon, her school counselor. As a result of the information conveyed by K.V., Laymon contacted Child Protective Services and the Houston Police Department. K.V. was then interviewed at the school about her statements. In addition, K.V. was interviewed by Lisa Holcomb, who was a forensic interviewer at the Harris County Child Assessment Center ("C.A.C."). An outcry witness should be over the age of 18 and be the person with whom the child victim first spoke about the offensive contact, other than the defendant.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllConsiderations for Establishing or Denying a Texas Partnership to Invest in Real Estate
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Morgan Lewis Says Global Clients Are Noticing ‘Expanded Capacity’ After Kramer Merger in Paris
- 2'Reverse Robin Hood': Capital One Swarmed With Class Actions Alleging Theft of Influencer Commissions in January
- 3Hawaii wildfire victims spared from testifying after last-minute deal over $4B settlement
- 4How We Won It: Latham Secures Back-to-Back ITC Patent Wins for California Companies
- 5Meta agrees to pay $25 million to settle lawsuit from Trump after Jan. 6 suspension
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250