What the Fifth Circuit's Ruling on Avoidance Actions Means for Debtors
"While the Fifth Circuit's decision put to bed a longstanding question of law, it also gives rise to many others," writes John Kane of Kane Russell Coleman Logan.
February 21, 2024 at 12:00 PM
6 minute read
On Monday, Jan. 22, 2024, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit entered a ruling in the South Coast Supply Company case, Briar Capital Working Fund Capital v. Remmert (In re South Coast Supply), Case No. 22-20536, Doc. No. 00517039869 (5th Cir. Jan. 22, 2024), allowing a bankrupt debtor to sell preference claims arising under section 547 of the Bankruptcy Code. (Title 11 of the United States Code, sections 101 et seq., is generally referred to as the Bankruptcy Code.) In doing so, the Fifth Circuit overruled the district court, which followed a long body of case law holding that debtors in possession could not sell avoidance actions. South Coast Supply, p. 5: ("the district court followed cases from bankruptcy courts ruling that outright sales of preference actions under 11 U.S.C. Section 547 are impermissible"). The Fifth Circuit's ruling in South Coast Supply will have meaningful effects on players in bankruptcy cases. Debtors have an immediately saleable asset that they can use to generate funds. Parties that lend money to debtors after the commencement of a bankruptcy case are generally referred to as "DIP Lenders" (DIP meaning debtor-in-possession). DIP lenders may subject avoidance actions to liens to secure post-petition loans. Official committees of unsecured creditors may now lack the leverage of judicial ambiguity within the Fifth Circuit once used to preserve avoidance actions for the exclusive (or sometimes shared) benefit of general unsecured creditors.
The Fifth Circuit's decision follows a logical analysis. First, the court recognizes that congressional authority supports a broad reading of what should be considered "property of the estate" under section 541(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code. Next, the court acknowledged that under section 541 of the Bankruptcy Code, property of the debtor's estate includes "all kinds of property" including "causes of action." Id. at 8 (citing In re Equinox Oil, 300 F.3d 614, 618 (5th Cir. 2002)).
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJCPenney Seeks Return of More Than $1.1M From Jackson Walker For Bankruptcy Work
3 minute readLegal Malpractice: Texas Supreme Court OKs 'Pernicious Distortion of Positions'
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Big Law Partner Co-Launches Startup Aiming to Transform Fund Formation Process
- 2How the Court of Public Opinion Should Factor Into Litigation Strategy
- 3Debevoise Lures Another SDNY Alum, Adding Criminal Division Chief
- 4Cooley Promotes NY Office Leader to Global Litigation Department Chair
- 5What Happens When Lateral Partners’ Guaranteed Compensation Ends?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250