The Disconnect Between Law Firms and Clients on Use of Gen AI
Our survey found that a similar share of law firm leaders (75%) and corporate legal executives (81%) have used Gen AI tools themselves, and roughly the same number of senior executives expect their investments in Gen AI technologies to increase either "significantly" or "modestly" over the next five years (90% in law firms, 86% in corporations).
March 22, 2024 at 01:23 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Senior leaders at large law firms and executives in corporate legal departments are largely in agreement that Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen AI) tools are likely to have a dramatic impact on the practice of law in the years ahead. But there are some notable and intriguing gaps between how firm leaders and their clients are thinking about a future in which Gen AI is a routine part of their workflows.
In January of 2024, LexisNexis surveyed 216 managing partners and other senior leaders at large law firms, as well as 50 executives in corporate legal departments at Fortune 1000 companies, to better understand the business impact of Gen AI technology on the legal industry.
Our survey found that a similar share of law firm leaders (75%) and corporate legal executives (81%) have used Gen AI tools themselves, and roughly the same number of senior executives expect their investments in Gen AI technologies to increase either "significantly" or "modestly" over the next five years (90% in law firms, 86% in corporations).
But there was an interesting disconnect between law firm leaders and their in-house counterparts when we asked for their predictions and expectations surrounding how Gen AI will impact the law firm/client relationship:
- An overwhelming 80% of corporate legal executives expect their outside counsel bills to be reduced as a result of Gen AI technology, yet just 9% of law firm leaders said their corporate clients have expressed that they expect their firm bills to be reduced as a result of Gen AI;
- Nearly three in four (72%) corporate legal professionals predicted that more work will be done in-house as a result of Gen AI adoption, but meanwhile 70% of law firm leaders predicted that Gen AI will enable their firms to deliver new value-added work to their clients;
- More than two-thirds (68%) of in-house counsel said they approve of their outside counsel using Gen AI tools on their company's legal work, yet just one-third (38%) of law firm leaders said their clients approve of law firms using Gen AI in their legal matters; and
- While 76% of corporate executives anticipate that Gen AI will decrease costs for their legal departments, fewer than half (47%) of law firm leaders expect that Gen AI will decrease costs for their firms.
The takeaway here is that Fortune 1000 in-house counsel have higher expectations regarding the potential for Gen AI to reduce corporate legal spending than their counterparts at large law firms, both in terms of cost savings opportunities and the ability for them to complete more work in-house.
The biggest disconnect, however, exists around expectations to changes in law firm billing. Most corporate legal executives expect to see a reduction in billing from their outside counsel due to efficiencies created by Gen AI, but just a small number of law firm leaders appear to be aware of this expectation. This is an important potential flash point to monitor as Gen AI adoption rises in the years ahead.
Download a free report of our 2024 Investing in Legal Innovation Survey: The Rise of Gen AI at Top Firms and Corporations.
To read more insights and thought leadership from Lexis+ Ai, click here.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDeal Watch: Private Equity Dealmakers Make 2025 Predictions Amid Deal Resurgence
12 minute readSheppard Mullin Expands in Dallas With 6-Lawyer White Collar Team From Bradley
3 minute readEversheds Sutherland Adds Hunton Andrews Energy Lawyer With Cross-Border Experience
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250