Defense Verdict: Alston & Bird Beat Back $35M Claim Against Nokia
An East Texas federal court jury found Nokia did not infringe on three patents owned by a Dallas firm seeking $35 million damages.
November 12, 2024 at 02:28 PM
3 minute read
Patent LitigationWhat You Need to Know
- A Dallas-based patent owner sought $35 million damages on patent infringement claims.
A coast-to-coast Alston & Bird legal team secured a defense win for Nokia of America Corp. in a jury trial before U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap.
Dallas area-based non-practicing entity, Correct Transmission LLC, sued Nokia based on four patents—three of which the jury was allowed to consider.
Correct Transmission had also sued Microsoft and other companies for infringement of the same network technology patents.
The trial took place in Marshall in the Eastern District of Texas. Jurors were introduced to the following three patents:
- The '523 patent, entitled "Spanning Tree Protocol Traffic in a Transparent LAN."
- The '465 patent, entitled "Hierarchical Virtual Private LAN Service Protection Scheme."
- The '928 patent, entitled "Connectivity Fault Management in Networks with Link Aggregation Group Connections.
Pretrial motions and discovery took more than two years. According to the docket, several rulings went against the plaintiff.
For instance, Smart Path Connections LLC, represented by the same counsel, tried a patent case against Nokia, Smart Path Connections, LLC v. Nokia of America, No. 2:22-cv-00343. At trial, Smart Path played a portion of the deposition of Nokia employee Phillipe Bergeon.
U.S. Magistrate Roy S. Payne, denied Correct Transmission's attempt to use that deposition testimony, stating, "less than three weeks before trial, (CT) moves to designate that deposition testimony in this action."
Prior to that, on Oct. 23, 2023, Payne's Claim Construction Order, which defines the meaning of a patent's claims, generally favored Nokia. The order stated, for instance, on one claim, "the term is limited to the construction proposed by the defendant."
Alston & Bird attorneys would not comment on the six-day trial, which concluded with the verdict entered on the nation's general election day, Nov. 5. The law firm issued a brief statement that explained the allegations referred to Nokia's router products.
According to Correct Transmission filings, the company sought about $35 million in damages.
Counsel for the plaintiff did not respond to a request for comment. According to ipfray.com, the plaintiff will likely try to get the verdict overruled, seek retrial, or appeal the case to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
While the jury's verdict found that Nokia did not infringen on any of the three patents, it also found that Nokia did not prevail on its counterclaim alleging patent '523 "invalid as lacking an adequate written description."
- Case: Correct Transmission LLC v. Nokia of America Corp.
- Case No.: 2:22-cv-00343
- Description: Patent Infringement
- Filing Date: Sept. 2, 2022
- Verdict Date: Nov. 5, 2024
- Judge: U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, Eastern District of Texas, Marshall
- Plaintiff Attorneys: Gregory S. Dovel, Dovel & Luner, Santa Monica, California; James T. Underwood, Gillam & Smith, Tyler, Texas; John J. Eichmann of Eichmann, A Professional Corp., Santa Monica, California.
- Defense Attorneys: Alston & Bird partners John D. Haynes (lead) and Nicholas Tsui of Atlanta, and Thomas Davison of Wash., D.C.; of counsel Caleb Bean, Los Angeles; and senior associates Nicholas Marais, Karlee Wroblewski, Katherine Rubschlager, and Madelaine Wieland.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Gordon Rees Opens 80th Office, ‘Collaboration Hub’ in Palo Alto
- 2The White Stripes Drop Copyright Claim Against Trump Campaign
- 3Law Firm Accused of Barratry for Allegedly Soliciting Crash Victims
- 4Carlton Fields Downsizes in Move to New Atlanta Office
- 5Trump's Selection of Zeldin to Head EPA Draws Surprise, Little Hope of Avoiding Deregulation
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250