Texas Trial Boutique Matches Milbank Bonuses, Paying Up to $140K
Vartabedian Hester & Haynes, a spinoff of Alston & Bird that launched in Fort Worth in January, announced a year-end bonus scale that will pay associates $21,000 to $140,000, matching Milbank's recently announced year-end scale along with the firm's summer bonus scale.
November 13, 2024 at 06:18 PM
3 minute read
Lawyer Compensation - Law FirmWhat You Need to Know
- Texas trial boutique Vartabedian Hester & Haynes is the first firm to match Milbank's associate bonus scale.
- The Fort Worth-founded firm will pay bonuses ranging from $21,000 to $140,000 at year-end.
- The scale incorporates Milbank's summer scale along with the year-end bonus scale it announced on Monday.
Texas trial firm Vartabedian Hester & Haynes is the first firm to announce a year-end bonus scale that matches Milbank's year-end bonus scale, which also incorporates the firm's earlier summer bonuses.
Vartabedian partners notified associates that it will pay bonuses ranging from $21,000 to associates from the class of 2024 up to $140,000 for associates from the class of 2016, according to a memo Vartabedian partners sent to associates on Wednesday, only two days after Milbank's announcement on Monday. The memo was first reported by Above the Law.
The Big Law bonus scale is a strong statement for Fort Worth-based Vartabedian, which was launched in late January by 10 energy litigators from Alston & Bird. The firm later added an office in Dallas, and, according to its website, has 15 lawyers.
However, founding partner Robert Vartabedian said in an interview the firm wasn't trying to send a message to the market from a firm that hasn't even celebrated its first anniversary.
"We were just trying to compensate the associates for the work they put in and the risk they took in leaving established law firms," he said.
The firm had "no real income" in January, February and March, but over the last seven months, the firm has been busy and had success in a couple contingent fee matters.
"Those seven months were good enough to put us in a position to have a very good year," he said.
The year-end bonuses will be paid at the end of the year to associates in good standing who have met the firm's 1,800-hour annual billable hour goal, and are employed with the firm on the date the bonus is paid, subject to start date prorations, according to a memo from partners provided to The American Lawyer by the firm.
The bonuses are in addition to signing bonuses and special bonuses including a $5,000 profit share awarded in May. Vartabedian said the profit share marked the time when the firm started making a profit.
"We started the firm with seemingly inconsistent goals: to provide the same level of excellent client service and results as when we were in Big Law, but at substantially lower rates; to lower billable hour requirements for associates, but to compensate associates in line with the top of the market. Despite no material revenue for the first three months of 2024 as we launched the firm, our hard work, dedication, and devoted clients put us in a position to meet all of these goals this year," the firm's partners wrote in the memo.
The partners wrote in the memo that the bonuses reflect the firm's commitment to "rewarding the high standard of work you consistently deliver and ensuring that your contributions are both recognized and valued."
Vartabedian's year-end bonus scale for associates:
- Class of 2024: $21,000
- Class of 2023: $26,000
- Class of 2022: $40,000
- Class of 2021: $72,500
- Class of 2020: $95,000
- Class of 2019: $115,000
- Class of 2018: $130,000
- Class of 2017: $140,000
- Class of 2016: $140,000
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Related Stories
View AllYou Might Like
View AllPartner Pay Transparency Is Eroding, Even if 'Black Box' Systems Haven't Caught On
6 minute readAbout to Become a Partner? Here's What to Know About Your Newfound Wealth
10 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Cravath Elevates 7 to Partnership, Up From Last Year
- 2Kline & Specter Hit With Lawsuit From Another Former Associate
- 3USPTO Director Kathi Vidal Announces Resignation Ahead of Administration Change
- 4As Gen AI Acceptance Grows, Lawyers Race to Mitigate Risks
- 5Decisions Have 'Real-Life Consequences': Juvenile Court Judge Considered for Appellate Bench
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250