Partner Compensation, Billing Rates Are Trending Higher in Dallas Than Houston
Hourly billing rates for partners in Dallas and Houston topped $1.1 million on average, close to the national average, according to the 2024 Partner Compensation Survey conducted by recruiting firm Major, Lindsey & Afric
November 14, 2024 at 05:58 PM
3 minute read
Law Firms - LargeWhat You Need to Know
- Average partner compensation in Dallas was higher than in Houston in 2023, according to Major, Lindsey & Africa's 2024 Partner Compensation Survey.
- Authors of the survey said that the results may be affected by a relatively small number of responses in the Texas markets.
- Following a national trend, average partner billing rates improved significantly in Dallas and Houston in 2023, compared with 2021, the survey found.
Partner compensation averaged $1.51 million in Dallas in 2023, up 4.1% compared with 2021, while the average of $1.28 million in compensation in Houston dropped 5.2% compared with 2021.
That compares with a national average of $1.41 million, recruiting firm Major, Lindsey & Africa reports in its 2024 Partner Compensation Survey Report, which surveyed equity and nonequity partners on their 2023 compensation.
A total of 66% of survey participants in Dallas said they were satisfied with their total compensation, while 75% in Houston said they were satisfied. Nationally, 72% of survey respondents in 2024 were satisfied with their compensation.
Karen Andersen, a partner at Major Lindsey who places partners and groups at firms in Southern California and the Pacific Northwest, said a relatively small number of partners in Dallas and Houston responded to the survey, which may have affected the results.
"My guess is that overall what’s going on in both markets at the Am Law 200 firm level is closer to what we are seeing nationally," she said.
Andersen wrote the survey report along with Louis Ramos, a managing director in Major Lindsey's partner practice group in Washington, D.C.
Originations in Dallas and Houston also declined, according to the survey report, and Andersen said the small sample sizes in Dallas and Houston may also be reflected in those findings.
"Looking at the national number is a better way of looking at it. Regression analysis shows that origination is the biggest factor in compensation," she said.
Originations in the 2024 survey for all survey respondents averaged $3.48 million, up 26% when compared with 2022. In Dallas, originations in 2024 were $4.01 million, down 4.8% from 2022, and came in at $3.12 million in Houston, down 2.5%, according to the report.
Following a national trend, however, billing rates improved significantly in both Texas markets, according to the report. Billing rates averaged $1,157 for the Dallas partners who responded to the survey, up 42%, and they averaged $1,147 in Houston, up 28%. The average hourly billing rate for all 2024 survey respondents came in at $1,114, an increase of 36% compared with the 2022 survey.
Andersen and Ramos each said the increased billing rates in the two Texas cities are relatively in line with the industry average.
The information is useful for lawyers, firms and recruiters, Ramos said.
"For us, any insight into what the market is doing is always helpful. It's helpful for all of us at MLA when we are talking to potential candidates who are thinking of making a lateral move, letting them know what the market is telling us … and also helpful in terms of law firms in giving them some sense of where market compensation is," he said.
The survey of partners at firms in the Am Law 200 was conducted during the summer; results are based on responses from 1,718 participants. The report includes results of individual markets such as Dallas and Houston when they are statistically meaningful.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Related Stories
View AllYou Might Like
View AllOn a Texas Growth Surge, Paul Hastings Signs New Leases in Houston, Dallas
3 minute readEnergy Lawyers Expect Demand for Energy Work to Stay Steady Under Second Trump Administration
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Maryland Atty Pushes Judge to Grant Discovery in Reverse Discrimination Suit Against King & Spalding
- 2Thompson Coburn Hit With Class Action Over Data Breach
- 3The Coming of Trump's Judicial Picks Spurs Liberals to Press for Biden's
- 4'We Should Be Pragmatic': Meet the Possible Next FTC Chair
- 5Bank of America's Cash Sweep Program Attracts New Legal Fire in Class Action
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250