'Great News' for Businesses? Judge Halts Transparency Mandate
A U.S. district judge in Texas ordered a temporary halt on Corporate Transparency Act reporting requirements for companies formed before 2024.
December 04, 2024 at 06:53 PM
4 minute read
Citing constitutional concerns, U.S. District Judge Amos Mazzant of the Eastern District of Texas in Sherman ordered a temporary injunction halting certain financial reporting requirements of the Corporate Transparency Act.
He granted the motion for preliminary injunction sought by the National Federation for Independent Businesses and numerous other small business plaintiffs.
Mazzant concluded that the CTA, as well as the U.S. Department of the Treasury's rule to implement it, are "likely unconstitutional as outside of Congress's power."
Matt Bisanz, a Mayer Brown partner in the firm's financial services practice who formerly worked at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, said, “This is great news for the more than 32 million American businesses who were facing a year-end deadline to disclose their private information to the government."
Bisanz said that the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network is likely to consider an emergency appeal. "Hopefully FinCEN gets the message from the court’s decision and does not try to impose an inequitable burden on new companies,” he said.
Ian Gary, executive director of The FACT Coalition, a nonpartisan alliance of more than 100 state, national, and international organizations that promotes policies to combat the harmful impacts of illicit finance on communities, said, “This wrongheaded injunction is a Christmas gift to criminals who use anonymous shell companies to traffic fentanyl, exploit people, and hide dirty money."
“The law is clearly constitutional and Congress was well within its powers to pass the law to defend America and protect our financial borders. Two other federal courts have reached the opposite conclusion and denied injunctions in similar cases, so we expect the government to move to stay this outlier order promptly," Gary said.
In Mazzant's 79-page opinion and order he states that the CTA regulates companies that are registered to do business under a state’s laws and requires those companies to report their ownership, including detailed, personal information about their owners, to the federal government or face severe penalties.
"Though seemingly benign, this federal mandate marks a drastic two-fold departure from history. First, it represents a federal attempt to monitor companies created under state law—a matter our federalist system has left almost exclusively to the several States," Mazzant said. "Second, the CTA ends a feature of corporate formation as designed by various states—anonymity. For good reason, Plaintiffs fear this flanking, quasi-Orwellian statute and its implications on our dual system of government.
"Despite attempting to reconcile the CTA with the Constitution at every turn, the Government is unable to provide the Court with any tenable theory that the CTA falls within Congress’s power," Mazzant added.
Erin Bryan, a Dorsey & Whitney partner and co-chair of its consumer financial services group, said, “While many are rightfully greeting this ruling with enthusiasm, this is not the end of the CTA or even the end of the beneficial ownership reporting requirements."
Other federal courts have considered the constitutionality of the beneficial ownership reporting requirements and reached mixed results, so the case could be headed for a showdown at the U.S. Supreme Court, Bryan said.
“Although the Texas ruling is a definite win for the industry, in some ways the court’s ruling also adds more confusion to the already murky CTA landscape. One aspect that this ruling does not address is whether newly formed entities are covered by the injunction, or if it only applies to companies that were in existence on Jan. 1, 2024. That may have been an intentional limitation by the court, or an oversight, but either way, it leaves uncertainty for the industry," Bryan said.
The plaintiffs' challenge to the law was prepared by Caleb Kruckenberg and Christian Clase of the Center for Individual Rights in Washington, D.C. Local counsel is John Clay Sullivan of SL Law in Cedar Hill.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1'No Finer Work': New York City Council Confirms Next Corporation Counsel
- 2Here’s What Litigators Want For Christmas
- 3Reported Refusal to Officiate Gay Wedding Prompts Review by NY Judicial Misconduct Watchdog
- 4Frozen-Potato Producers Face Profiteering Allegations in Surge of Antitrust Class Actions
- 5CooperSurgical Class Action Survives Motion to Dismiss
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250