It has been a rough couple of weeks for two large Texas firms after intermediate appellate courts ruled that they are disqualified from representing clients because of unusual conflict-of-interest allegations.
In an April 16 mandamus opinion in In Re: Guaranty Insurance Services Inc. , Austin’s 3rd Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court decision and ruled that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion when he disqualified Strasburger & Price from representing a client in an insurance-coverage case because a Strasburger legal assistant had worked for the opposing party in the case while employed at a different firm.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
