In a rare ruling in a patent case, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has upheld sanctions without a finding of inequitable conduct — i.e., fraud on the patent office. The court affirmed a finding that patent holding company Eon-Net “pursued baseless infringement allegations in bad faith and for an improper purpose.” The decision discussed the inequities involving companies that use their patents solely to demand licenses or bring suits, sometimes referred to as patent trolls.
The Federal Circuit’s July 29 unanimous panel ruling in Eon-Net v. Flagstar Bancorp affirmed an exceptional case finding by Judge Ricardo Martinez of the District of Washington, as well as his subsequent order for patent lawyer Jean-Marc Zimmerman and Eon-Net to pay $631,135.18 in sanctions and fees.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
