Faced with a severely injured plaintiff and a 2-1 panel decision against his defendant-architect clients, J. Bruce Bennett’s chances of prevailing in an en banc rehearing before Austin’s 3rd Court of Appeals didn’t look good. Yet Bennett’s clients won anyway.
According to the appeals court’s en banc 4-2 majority opinion, the background to the Aug. 5 decision in Black + Vernooy Architects, et al. v. Lou Ann Smith, et al. is as follows: The plaintiffs sued the defendants alleging negligence in connection with injuries two plaintiffs sustained when a home’s second-floor balcony they were standing on collapsed. Smith was rendered a paraplegic because of her injuries and Karen Gravely suffered a broken finger, a crushed toe and multiple bruises. Prior to trial, the plaintiffs settled with the homeowners and the general contractor who built the balcony. The plaintiffs proceeded to trial against the architects who designed the balcony and a jury found them liable, awarding Smith and her family $380,749.19, but awarding Gravely nothing.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
