Two Dallas lawyers who litigated a groundbreaking case that allowed plaintiffs to pursue legal-malpractice cases in federal court are now embroiled in a suit of their own, pitting the former co-counsel against each other as plaintiff and defendant.
Chris Kling v. Paul Storm and Storm LLP was filed Nov. 21 in the 191st District Court in Dallas. In the petition, Kling alleges that Storm and Storm LLP failed between 2008 and 2009 to pay bonuses owed to him.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
