Pursuing attorneys’ fees as sanctions against an opposing party usually is a risky move of last resort. But that’s what Patrick Mizell’s and Shauna Clark’s defendant-clients decided to do in lengthy litigation — sanctions Houston’s 14th Court of Appeals affirmed on May 3.

In the consolidated appeals in Nath v. Texas Children’s Hospital and Nath v. Baylor College of Medicine, the 14th Court sets out the following: In February 2006, Texas Children’s Hospital (TCH) and Baylor College of Medicine (Baylor) were among those sued by Dr. Rahul K.Nath, a plastic surgeon, for alleged tortious interference with prospective business relations and defamation.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]