On Feb. 28 after five hours of deliberation, a Dallas jury delivered a $49 million verdict in favor of Brian Hail’s clients, even though their representatives had not testified at the preceding two-and-a-half week trial.

"We proved the liability part of our case strictly through the other side’s witnesses," says Hail, a partner in Dallas’ Gruber Hurst Johansen Hail Shank. He says he made that decision after the trial began in the 162nd District Court in Dallas.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]