It’s tough for appellate courts to divine the legal ethics of social media, which changes constantly. Yet in a recent opinion, Dallas’ 5th Court of Appeals has started the discussion on what constitutes bias when a trial court judge uses Facebook and is "friends" with someone closely connected to a case he hears.

In a case of first impression, the 5th Court ruled that a trial judge’s pre-existing Facebook friendship with the father of a crime victim was not evidence of bias.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]