To the Editor:

Your article “Social Anxieties: Facebook, Judges and Ethics” [Texas Lawyer, May 27, 2013, page 1] was marred by key omissions and a failure to address the whole story. The 5th District Court of Appeals cited an article that was actually co-authored by me and Judge Gena Slaughter; my status as co-author is missing from your article, but not from the court’s opinion. That omission is glaring indeed, especially given the fact that my work in social media and the law, including this article, has been cited as authority in dozens of law review articles, and judges as far away as New Zealand. It’s especially odd, since both of the Texas judges quoted in your article have previously relied upon my published works in this area, including my book The Lawyer’s Guide to Social Networking: Understanding Social Media’s Impact on the Law (West 2010). Finally, it’s particularly glaring in light of the fact that I took the time to speak with John Council by telephone in hopes of seeing an accurate and complete article.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]