With a factual background that includes an imprisoned former state district judge, a strange jury note that led to a hasty $3 million settlement in that judge’s court, and a corporate defendant that later proved that it settled as a result of fraud, Ford Motor v. Ezequiel Castillo is becoming the stuff of legend for modern Texas Supreme Court decisions.
Perhaps never before have so many enticing facts been packed into an 11-page per curiam opinion—the unsigned and normally unremarkable decisions the high court reserves for rulings it believes should have no precedential value.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
