A district judge in Bexar County won’t decide until 2015 whether to quash indictments against two lawyers for felony barratry, or the unlawful solicitation of a legal client.
Paul Andrews and Keith Gould had alleged that their barratry indictments were void because they did not name the prospective client who they allegedly paid others for soliciting. The state countered that the law did not require the indictment to name the prospective client—but later, the state filed a motion to amend the indictment to name the person.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
