In the courtroom, winning depends as much on the documents in evidence as the testimony of the witnesses or the skill of the lawyers. Yet the typical exhibit list in most trials contains an undifferentiated listing of documents that often does little more than dump every deposition and summary judgment exhibit onto the exhibit list. These undifferentiated exhibit lists interfere with the trial lawyer’s most important job: telling the story of the case.
There is a better way. Trial courts should encourage, if not order, lawyers to use storyboard exhibit lists to outline the story of the case. Imagine the hypothetical breach-of-contract case of Flintstone v. Rubble. A simplified storyboard exhibit list looks something like this:
| No. | Description |
| Fred and Barney strike a deal | |
| 1 | “Let’s meet Friday” email, 2/1/13 |
| 2 | “We have a deal” email, 2/3/13 |
| Barney fails to deliver the widgets | |
| 3 | “We have some problems, Fred” email, 11/16/2013 |
| 4 | Foreclosure notice from Bedrock Bank, 11/16/2013 |
| Fred’s damages | |
| 5 | Lost profits calculations of Joe Rockhead, CPA |
| 6 | Market data from Joe Rockhead, CPA |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
