Last year, Dallas attorney William Munck did what he knew best when a for-profit lacrosse business was allegedly preventing his son’s advancement in the sport—he made a federal case about it.
And Munck seemed to get what he wanted in an agreed order that dismisses Munck v. Dallas Lacrosse Academy in a Sherman U.S. district court, which alleged the defendants had operated in violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. [See "Game On: Lawyer-Dad Sues Lacrosse Business Under RICO," Texas Lawyer, April 7, 2014.]
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
