There is a widespread belief that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is uniformly hostile to employment law claims. But, like Mark Twain’s death, this rumor has been widely exaggerated.

First off, take Thompson v. City of Waco, a 2014 decision in which en banc review, over four dissents, was denied on Feb. 26. Here is the deal: An employer can confess to taking action against an employee with discriminatory animus, but there is no violation of Title VII or §1981 unless something really bad happens to the employee (i.e. an adverse employment action) such as termination, refusal to hire (for applicants), being demoted or being denied a promotion. Anything else (including reprimands, lateral transfers and other opportunities) and the plaintiff is out of luck. Until now. A panel of the Fifth Circuit looked at these facts in reversing the denial of a Rule 12 (b)(6) motion in a race discrimination case.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]