Johnson & Johnson waited almost one year after a take-nothing jury verdict in the first bellwether case in hip replacement device multidistrict litigation before it filed a motion seeking a final judgment.
“Entry of judgment in the bellwether cases is important to ensure that any appellate issues are timely resolved and that the bellwether process resolves individual cases rather than just providing advisory verdicts,” Johnson & Johnson states in its motion, filed on Oct. 5.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
