A disputed issue this year, one in which the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit appears to hold a minority view, concerns the propriety of a “third-party release” through a chapter 11 plan. As a basic principle, the bankruptcy code provides a chapter 11 debtor the opportunity to obtain a “fresh start” by confirming a plan of reorganization. With few exceptions, a reorganized debtor exits bankruptcy owing only those obligations preserved in the confirmed plan. The bankruptcy code does not, however, contemplate the discharge of liabilities belonging to non-debtors. Third-party releases operate to extinguish the liability of a non-debtor arising from certain claims, causes of action, and other rights to payment held by third parties in interest.
Considering that the bankruptcy code does not explicitly authorize such non-debtor releases—and that some courts interpret the code to expressly prohibit them—it is unsurprising that a circuit split has emerged over this issue. The U.S. Supreme Court has not yet provided a dispositive answer to the question of whether bankruptcy courts possess the jurisdiction to order non-consensual third-party releases, leaving three main camps – pro-release, anti-release, and undecided—to form within the U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeal.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
