A Houston appeals court reversed a trial court’s sanction disbarring Robert S. Bennett of Houston and remanded it for reconsideration of the “appropriate sanction” after finding evidence is insufficient to support the trial court’s conclusion that Bennett violated two disciplinary rules.
A panel of the Fourteenth Court of Appeals found legally and factually sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s conclusion that Bennett violated Rules 3.02 of the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct, but found insufficient evidence he violated Rule 1.15(d).
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
