In his opinion written for the majority last month striking down a Texas law that put additional restrictions on where and how abortions could take place, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer wrote that the decision hinged on “concrete factual developments that occurred once enforcement started and a significant number of clinics closed.”
Some more “concrete” facts became available late in the afternoon June 30, three days after the high court issued its ruling.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
