U.S. Department of Justice lawyers filed an advisory with evidence about why their shorthand references to immigration programs may have led a Brownsville, Texas, federal judge to conclude, incorrectly, that they lied to him.

The DOJ advisory, filed Aug. 8, was another attempt by DOJ lawyers to persuade U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen to not impose the sanctions order he previously issued and then stayed temporarily, which called for them to undergo department-wide ethics training.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]