In a case that’s troubling for Texas employers but exciting for employees, the Fourth Court of Appeals in San Antonio affirmed a big payday judgment for a plaintiff in a retaliation case under the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act (TCHRA). It is troubling because the facts are mundane.

The Oct. 23 opinion in San Antonio Water System v. Nicholas tells the story: A female paralegal for the San Antonio Water System mentioned to the company GC that the vice president of customer service and communications/external relations department had asked her to lunch and she felt uncomfortable. The CEO got involved, human resources employee (and later plaintiff) Debra Nicholas was asked to investigate, and she and the CEO met with the VP. The CEO told the VP to stop asking out female employees and Nicholas chimed in, “[Y]ou need to listen to Dave [the CEO] because what’s he’s telling you is for your own good.” Fast-forward three years. Nicolas is placed in that very same VP’s chain of command, and she’s let go in a company reorganization.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]