X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

OPINION ON REMANDBefore Justices Francis, Evans, and Stoddart Opinion by Justice EvansBernard Winfield Shortt appealed an order which granted him “shock” probation and imposed restitution as a condition of probation. Shortt contended that the order violated his Fifth Amendment right against double jeopardy and requested that the Court delete the restitution order. This Court concluded that there was no statutory authority which conferred jurisdiction on an appeal court to consider an appeal from an order imposing shock probation and dismissed the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Shortt v. State, No. 05-13-01639-CR, 2015 WL 2250152 (Tex. App.—Dallas May 12, 2015, judgm’t vacated). The Court of Criminal Appeals granted Shortt’s petition for discretionary review and a majority concluded that the courts of appeals have the authority to entertain a defendant’s appeal from an order granting “shock” community supervision pursuant to section 23(b) of article 42.12 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. Shortt v. State, 539 S.W.3d 321 (Tex. Crim. App. 2018). Having considered the appellant’s sole issue, we sustain Shortt’s point of error and modify the order to delete the imposition of restitution.ANALYSISWe provided a detailed recitation of the facts in our opinion on original submission and do not recount them here. Shortt, 2015 WL 2250152 at *1-2. In his sole point of error, Shortt asserted that the trial court erred and violated his Fifth Amendment right against double jeopardy by including restitution as a condition of his shock probation. The State conceded that the Court should modify the conditions of community supervision to delete the invalid restitution condition. We agree that the order should be modified to delete the imposition of restitution.In this instance, the trial court assessed a punishment of seven years’ community supervision and $9,085 in restitution in its order of deferred adjudication. When an accused receives deferred adjudication, however, no sentence is imposed. Taylor v. State, 131 S.W.3d 497, 502 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). Thus, when guilt is adjudicated, the order adjudicating guilt sets aside the order deferring adjudication. Id.; Abron v. State, 997 S.W.2d 281, 282 (Tex. App.— Dallas 1998, pet. refd) (“The trial court’s Judgment Adjudicating Guilt expressly sets aside the underlying deferred adjudication order and declares it to be ‘of no further force and effect.’”). Here, the trial court sentenced appellant to ten years’ confinement in the order adjudicating guilt. The trial court, however, did not mention any fine or restitution in its adjudication. In fact, the trial court neither orally pronounced a fine or restitution nor did it mention a fine or restitution in its written judgment. Therefore, because the trial court did not include restitution as part of its adjudication of guilt, restitution could not later be imposed as a term of probation in the court’s shock probation order.When a trial court imposes an invalid condition of community supervision, the proper remedy is to reform the judgment by removing the condition. Ex parte Pena, 739 S.W.2d 50, 51 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987). Accordingly, we sustain appellant’s sole issue and modify the Order Placing Defendant on Probation to delete the imposition of restitution.CONCLUSIONAs modified, we affirm the trial court’s Order Placing Defendant on Probation./David Evans/DAVID EVANSJUSTICEDo Not PublishTex. R. App. P. 47131639RF.U05Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at DallasJUDGMENTBERNARD WINFIELD SHORTT,AppellantNo. 05-13-01639-CR V.THE STATE OF TEXAS, AppelleeOn Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, TexasTrial Court Cause No. F07-00193-M.Opinion delivered by Justice Evans.Justices Francis and Stoddart participating.Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the order of the trial court is MODIFIED as follows:condition of community supervision (q) is deleted from the Order Placing Defendant on Probation Under Article 42.12, Section 3(e) Code of Criminal Procedure.As MODIFIED, the order is AFFIRMED.Judgment entered this 2nd day of May, 2018

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
April 08, 2025 - April 09, 2025
Chicago, IL

Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies


Learn More
November 27, 2024
London

Celebrating achievement, excellence, and innovation in the legal profession in the UK.


Learn More
December 02, 2024 - December 03, 2024
Scottsdale, AZ

Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers and financiers for the real estate healthcare event of the year!


Learn More

Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in the New York office for an attorney in our renowned Labor & Employment Department, working...


Apply Now ›

Our client, a large, privately-owned healthcare company, has engaged us to find an Assistant General Counsel for their headquarters located ...


Apply Now ›

A prestigious matrimonial law firm in Garden City is seeking a skilled Associate Attorney with 5 to 7 years of experience in family law. The...


Apply Now ›