State of Texas v. Chen

Appellee was charged with harassment via electronic communication.

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

OPINION ON REHEARING We grant rehearing on our own motion, withdraw our prior opinion issued on August 24, 2022, and substitute the following opinion of the Court. Appellee was charged with harassment via electronic communications. See TEX. PENAL CODE § 42.07(a)(7). He filed a pre-trial habeas writ application and motion to quash the charging instrument,arguing theelectronic harassmentstatute isfaciallyunconstitutional and also unconstitutional as applied to him under the First Amendment. The trial court ruled that the statute is facially unconstitutional and granted relief. The State appealed[1], and a majority of the Court of Appeals held the statute to be unconstitutionally overbroad. State v. Chen, 615 S.W.3d 376 (Tex. App. — Houston [14th] 2020, pet. filed). The State has filed a petition for discretionary review arguing that Appellee failed to meet his burden to show the statute is unconstitutionally overbroad and that the majority erred in its analysis. In Ex parte Barton, No. PD-1123-19, 2022 WL 1021061 (Tex. Crim. App. Apr. 6, 2022), and Ex parte Sanders, No. PD-0469-19, 2022 WL 1021055 (Tex. Crim. App. Apr. 6, 2022), we held a previous version of the statute, first adopted in 2001, constitutional on its face. See Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 1222 (S.B. 139), § 1, eff. Sept. 1, 2001. Appellee’s case is governed by the 2017 version of the electronic harassment statute. See Acts 2017, 85th Leg., ch. 522 (S.B. 179), §§ 13, 14, eff. Sept. 1, 2017. The Court of Appeals in the instant case did not have the benefit of our decisions in Ex parte Barton and Ex parte Sanders. Accordingly, we grant the State’s petition for discretionary review, vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and remand this case to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of Ex parte Barton and Ex parte Sanders. DELIVERED NOVEMBER 23, 2022 PUBLISH

State of Texas v. Chen

Appellee was charged with harassment via electronic communication.

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing!

Trending Stories

More From ALM

Subscribe to Texas Lawyer