NPOAN was not authorized to exercise architectural control authority in section eight of the subdivision at the time Anderson constructed her driveway, and it did not show the construction was otherwise contrary to an action of an architectural control committee acting with authority in Section Eight. Therefore, NPOAN's rejection of Anderson's plans and its suit to remove the driveway represent an arbitrary and capricious act.
November 10, 2003 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Texas Lawyer honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in Texas.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
U.S. BANKRUPTCY JUDGESHIP VACANCY District of New Jersey Chief Judge Michael A. Chagares of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third...
McCarter & English, LLP, a well established and growing law firm, is actively seeking a talented and driven associate having 2-5 years o...
Company DescriptionA prominent boutique AV rated Education Law firm located in Westbury, New York. Our firm specializes in education law, sp...