Because appellants' two letters were related to a matter that the Federal Aviation Administration was authorized to investigate and determine whether appellants' aircraft were in compliance with federal aviation laws appellants' statements in their letters were related to a quasi-judicial proceeding and were absolutely privileged, regardless of the truth, falsity or malicious nature of the statements.
August 16, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies
Honoring outstanding legal achievements focused at the national level, largely around Big Law and in-house departments.
Women Leaders in Consulting Awards honors the industry standouts and rising stars who are making a mark within the profession.
Our client, a highly distinguished regional law firm, is seeking to hire a Capital Markets Associate for their growing office. Candidates s...
Carlton Fields is seeking an associate to join our Hartford office with three to five years of construction litigation experience. Excellent...
Javerbaum Wurgaft, a large civil litigation firm with nine (9) offices, seeks: Plaintiff Personal Injury Attorney for Northern New Jersey of...
