The gas division order did not modify the general rule that post-production costs are proportionately borne by the operator and the royalty interest owners. Because appellees were entitled to deduct compression and treatment costs in computing gas royalties owed to appellants, the trial court did not err in granting appellees' motion for summary judgment on this ground.
January 23, 2006 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Texas Lawyer honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in Texas.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
The New Jersey State Commission of Investigation (SCI) is seeking an experienced and visionary leader to serve as its next Executive Directo...
We are a boutique firm specializing the area of real estate law and handling both litigation and transactional matters. We are seeking an as...
Rabb, Hamill, P.A, located in Woodbridge, NJ, seeks an experienced NJ licensed Personal Injury Trial attorney. The successful candidate wi...