Filter This View

  • Methodist Healthcare System of San Antonio, Ltd. v. Rankin

    Publication Date: 2010-03-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-03-12
    Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Justice Willett
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 08-0316

    Argued September 9, 2009This case pits the ten-year statute of repose for healthcare-liability claims*fn1 against the Texas Constitution's Open Courts provision.a

  • Chase Bank USA, N.A. v. McCoy

    Publication Date: 2011-01-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-24
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 09–329

    CHASE BANK USA, N. A., Petitioner v. JAMES A. McCOY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated p id="casenu

  • University of Houston v. Barth

    Publication Date: 2013-06-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-06-14
    Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: PER CURIAM
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 12-0358

    On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas

  • Lynda Marino v. Charles King

    Publication Date: 2011-11-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-10-21
    Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 10-0854

    This is an appeal from a summary judgment based on deemed admissions. By rule, a request for admission is considered admitted if a response is not timely served. TEX. R. CIV. P. 198.3. The respo

  • Texas Dep't of Insurance v. Reconveyance Services, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2010-03-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-03-12
    Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 07-0786

    Reconveyance Services, Inc., sued the Texas Department of Insurance for a declaration that charging additional fees for the services Reconveyance wished to provide in Texas is not prohibited by the Te

  • Italian Cowboy Partners, Ltd., Francesco Secchi and Jane Secchi v. the Prudential Insurance Company of America and Four Partners, LLC D/B/A

    Publication Date: 2011-04-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-04-15
    Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 08-0989

    Orders Pronounced April 15, 2011ORDERS ON CAUSESThe Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment, renders judgment in part, and remands the case to that court. Justice Green delivered the

  • Ryan v. Gonzales

    Publication Date: 2013-01-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-01-08
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 10-930 No. 11-218

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 276CHARLES L. RYAN, Petitionerv.ERNEST VALENCIA GONZALESNo. 10

  • In Re Alice M. Puig

    Publication Date: 2011-07-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-07-01
    Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 10-0460

    ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUSIn this case, we are asked to grant mandamus relief to correct a district court's denial of a plea to the jurisdiction. The plea challenged the district cou

  • Klein v. Hernandez

    Publication Date: 2010-05-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-05-07
    Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: David M. Medina Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 08-0453

    Argued October 7, 2009JUSTICE MEDINA delivered the opinion of the Court.JUSTICE WILLETT filed a concurring opinion.By statute, a state employee may appeal an interlocutory order denying a mot

  • Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2012-06-21
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-06-21
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 10-1293

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 6866 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL., Petitioners v. FOX TELEVISION STATION