• Texas Health Insurance Riskpool v. Sigmundik

    Publication Date: 2010-06-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-05-28
    Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 09-0772

    This health-insurance subrogation case turns on two rudimentary principles:1. A trial court abuses its discretion when it invokes the equitable "made whole" doctrine to circumvent a party's contrac

  • United States v. Ressam

    Publication Date: 2008-05-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-05-19
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For petitioner: Paul Clement, Office of the Solicitor General, Washington, D.C.
    for defendant: For respondent: Thomas Hillier II, Federal Public Defender, Seattle.

    Case Number: 07-455

    Cite as 08 C.D.O.S. 5976UNITED STATES, PETITIONER AHMED RESSAMNo. 07455In the Supreme Court of the United StatesOn Writ of Certiorari to the Uni

  • Lloyds v. Page

    Publication Date: 2010-06-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-06-11
    Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Harriet O'Neill Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 08-0799

    Argued November 19, 2009Once again we are called upon to interpret the Texas Standard Homeowner's Policy-Form B, in this instance to decide whether it affords coverage for mold contamination result

  • Florida v. Harris

    Publication Date: 2013-02-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-02-19
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: No. 11-817

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 1870FLORIDA, PETITIONERv.CLAYTON HARRISNo. 11-817p class="

  • Bullock v. Bankchampaign, N.A.

    Publication Date: 2013-05-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-05-13
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: No. 11-1518

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 4723RANDY CURTIS BULLOCK, PETITIONERv.BANKCHAMPAIGN, N. A.p

  • Atmos Energy Corp. v. Railroad Commission of Texas

    Publication Date: 2011-12-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-11-18
    Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Justice Wainwright
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: NO. 10-0375

    Argued September 15, 2011In 2003, the Texas Legislature amended the Gas Utility Regulatory Act (GURA) to allow gas utilities (Utilities) an opportunity to recover capital investments in Te

  • City of Houston v. Trail Enterprises, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2009-11-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-10-30
    Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 08-0413

    In this inverse condemnation case, we consider whether the court of appeals erred by rendering a money judgment against the City of Houston on mineral interest owners' regulatory takings claims. We ho

  • United States v. Home Concrete & Supply, LLC

    Publication Date: 2012-04-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-04-25
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: No. 11-139

    UNITED STATES, Petitioner v. HOME CONCRETE & SUPPLY, LLC, ET AL. No. 11-139

  • Travis Central Appraisal District v. Dianeleenorman

    Publication Date: 2011-05-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-04-29
    Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: David M. Medina Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: NO. 09-0100

    Argued December 16, 2009JUSTICE MEDINA delivered the opinion of the Court. The Texas Anti-Retaliation Law, found in Chapter 451 of the Texas Labor Code, prohibits a person from discharg

  • Felton v. Lovett

    Publication Date: 2012-12-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-11-30
    Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Nathan L. Hecht Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: NO. 11-0252

    Argued September 13, 2012 JUSTICE HECHT delivered the opinion of the Court. J USTICE JOHNSON did not participate in the decision. Health care must be based on a patient's inform