Filter This View

  • City of Elsa, Texas v. Gonzalez

    Publication Date: 2010-10-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-10-01
    Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 09-0834

    Joel Homer Gonzalez sued the City of Elsa, alleging he was unlawfully terminated from his position as city manager in violation of the Texas Whistleblower Act. See TEX. GOV'T CODE § 554.002. The

  • Kloeckner v. Solis

    Publication Date: 2012-12-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-12-10
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 11-184

    CAROLYN M. KLOECKNER, Petitioner v. HILDA L. SOLIS, SECRETARY OF LABOR No. 11-1

  • FKM Partnership, Ltd. v. Board of Regents of the University of Houston System

    Publication Date: 2008-06-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-06-06
    Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Phil Johnson Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 05-0661

    Argued March 21, 2007JUSTICE JOHNSON delivered the opinion of the Court, in which CHIEF JUSTICE JEFFERSON, JUSTICE HECHT, JUSTICE O'NEILL, JUSTICE WAINWRIGHT, JUSTICE BRISTER, JUSTICE MEDINA, and J

  • Berghuis v. Smith

    Publication Date: 2010-03-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-03-30
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    MARY BERGHUIS, WARDEN, PETITIONER v.DIAPOLIS SMITHNo. 08-1402In the

  • Eberhard Samlowski, M.D v. Carolwooten

    Publication Date: 2011-03-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-02-25
    Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: David M. Medina Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 08-0667

    Argued November 18, 2009JUSTICE MEDINA announced the judgment of the Court and delivered an opinion in which CHIEF JUSTICE JEFFERSON and JUSTICE HECHT joined.JUSTICE GUZMAN filed an opinion conc

  • United States v. Home Concrete & Supply, LLC

    Publication Date: 2012-04-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-04-25
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 11-139

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 4476 UNITED STATES, Petitioner v. HOME CONCRETE & SUPPLY, LLC, ET AL. p id="

  • Whirlpool Corp. v. Camacho

    Publication Date: 2009-12-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-12-11
    Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Justice Johnson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 08-0175

    Argued March 10, 2009JUSTICE GUZMAN did not participate in the decision.In this products liability case the jury found that a design defect in an electric Whirlpool clothes dryer caused a fatal

  • Certified EMS Inc. v. Potts

    Publication Date: 2013-02-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-02-15
    Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Wallace B. Jefferson Chief Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 11-0517

    Argued October 17, 2012CHIEF JUSTICE JEFFERSON delivered the opinion of the Court.A patient alleged that a hospital nurse, who was temporarily placed with the hospital by a staf

  • In re E.C.R.

    Publication Date: 2013-06-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-06-14
    Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Wallace B. Jefferson, Chief Justice.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 12-0744

    Argued April 23, 2013 On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas

  • Basic Capital Management, Inc., American realty trust, Inc v. Dynex commercial, Inc. and Dynex Capital, Inc

    Publication Date: 2011-04-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-04-01
    Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Nathan L. Hecht Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 08-0244

    Argued September 10, 2009JUSTICE HECHT delivered the opinion of the Court.This is an action for breach of a commitment to provide financing for future real estate investments. The borrowers were