Filter This View

  • In Re Anderson Construction Co., et al.

    Publication Date: 2011-04-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-04-07
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 9
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 09-11-00072-CV

    Original ProceedingOPINIONAnderson Construction Company and Ronnie Anderson (collectively "Anderson") have petitioned for mandamus relief from the trial court in a construction defect lawsuit fi

  • In re Lester

    Publication Date: 2008-05-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-05-15
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 9
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 09-08-086 CV

    Original ProceedingSubmitted on April 10, 2008OPINIONThis is an original proceeding in which the relator, Myron D. Lester, challenges the trial court's denial of his motion to transfer to For

  • In re Estate of Hoelzer

    Publication Date: 2010-05-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-04-29
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 9
    Judge: David Gaultney Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 09-09-00003-CV

    OPINIONRichard David Hoelzer challenges an order removing him as independent executor of the estate of Carl Hoelzer. Under the circumstances, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in proceed

  • Packard Engineering Associates v. The Sally Group L.L.C.

    Publication Date: 2013-04-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-03-28
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 9
    Judge: Steve McKEITHEN Chief Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 09-12-00325-CV

    OPINIONAppellants Packard Engineering Associates and Richard Packard (collectively "Packard") appeal the trial court's order denying their motion to dismiss. See Tex. C

  • Hanna v. Impact Recovery Systems, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2009-08-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-08-27
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 9
    Judge: David Gaultney Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 09-08-00090-CV

    OPINIONAppellants are Cassandra Humble's parents and children. They sued Impact Recovery Systems, Inc., the Texas Department of Transportation, and John Thomas, Inc. The plaintiffs allege Humble's

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    District of Columbia Legal Malpractice Law 2024

    Authors: Shari L. Klevens, Alanna G. Clair

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Como v. City of Beaumont

    Publication Date: 2011-06-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-06-02
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 9
    Judge: Hollis Horton Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 09-10-00192-CV

    OPINIONThis is an appeal from the trial court‟s dismissal of a suit based on a city‟s claim of sovereign immunity. The City of Beaumont declared Yvonne Comoȁ

  • Kodiak Resources Inc. v. Smith

    Publication Date: 2012-02-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-02-16
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 9
    Judge: Hollis Horton Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 09-10-00362-CV

    & OPINIONPatricia Ann Smith, Beverly Lee Smith Sunday, Melody Koch, KeithWeeks, T.J. Pilgrim, Deanna Prunes, and Lee Ann Graham*fn1&

  • R&R Marine Inc. v. Max Access Inc.

    Publication Date: 2012-07-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-07-26
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 9
    Judge: Charles Kreger Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 09-11-00396-CV

    OPINION Appellant, R&R Marine, Inc. challenges t al court‟s rendition of partial summary judgment in favor of Max Access, Inc.*fn1 and t

  • Manning v. Enbridge Pipelines (East Texas) L.P.

    Publication Date: 2011-07-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-07-14
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 9
    Judge: David Gaultney Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 09-10-00205-CV

    OPINIONThis appeal concerns a condemnation action in which the parties agreed on the amount of compensation, $32,005, for a pipeline easement, but tried other contested issues. The landown

  • Milo v. Martin

    Publication Date: 2010-05-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-04-29
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 9
    Judge: Hollis Horton Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 09-09-00145-CV

    Submitted on December 3, 2009OPINIONWe are asked to consider whether the trial court erred in granting the appellees' no-evidence motion for summary judgment. We affirm.BACKGROUNDPlaintiff