Avoiding Penalties When Classifying Independent Contractors
Over the last several years, members of Congress (including U.S. Sen. Bob Casey, D-Pennsylvania) have introduced and reintroduced the Payroll Fraud Prevention Act, designed to target employers that intentionally misclassify employees as independent contractors.
June 29, 2015 at 01:22 PM
8 minute read
Over the last several years, members of Congress (including U.S. Sen. Bob Casey, D-Pennsylvania) have introduced and reintroduced the Payroll Fraud Prevention Act, designed to target employers that intentionally misclassify employees as independent contractors. If passed, the law would amend the Fair Labor Standards Act to mandate that businesses provide notice to all individuals of whether they are classified as an “employee” or “non-employee” and to subject businesses to civil penalties for each instance in which they violate the law. More importantly, however, the law would permit the Department of Labor to conduct targeted audits of industries “with frequent incidence” of misclassification and would authorize the DOL to report misclassification incidents to the Internal Revenue Service.
Although the proposed law has not yet been the subject of a vote in either the U.S. Senate or the U.S. House of Representatives, the DOL's “Key Enforcement Initiatives,” released in February, list “Addressing the Fissured Workforce” (which is a synonym for independent contractor misclassification) as the first initiative. Considering the DOL's recent history—which includes recovery of more than $1.3 billion in back wages for individuals since 2009—employers that use independent contractors in the construction, home health care, staffing, transportation, security, hospitality, custodial and medical industries (to name only a few) should be extremely diligent in their classification of contractors, as the DOL has indicated it will focus on these industries. As the federal government and plaintiffs attorneys increase the focus on how businesses pay and classify their workforces, businesses must be diligent in confirming that independent contractors are not actually employees.
Unfortunately, this is easier said than done. While the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit and Pennsylvania courts have articulated tests and criteria to define whether an independent contractor is an employee, there is no one-size-fits-all consensus on how the tests should be analyzed or which issues are most important.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: For Big Law Names, Shorter is Sweeter
- 2Wine, Dine and Grind (Through the Weekend): Summer Associates Thirst For Experience in 'Real Matters'
- 3'That's Disappointing': Only 11% of MDL Appointments Went to Attorneys of Color in 2023
- 4What We Know About the Kentucky Judge Killed in His Chambers
- 5'I'm Staying Everything': Texas Bankruptcy Judge Halts Talc Trials Against J&J
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250