Review of Recent Changes Relating to Handling of Client Funds
With September comes the new season, the new school year and an opportunity to look back as summer moves into fall. During this year, important changes were made to the Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct and the Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement relating to the way attorneys handle client money, either in Interest on Lawyers' Trust Accounts or trusts. These rules were amended because the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania felt that, while the Office of Disciplinary Counsel could adequately investigate and litigate cases of embezzlement and theft, the board's ability to identify and prevent these crimes needed to be strengthened.
September 28, 2015 at 08:00 PM
6 minute read
With September comes the new season, the new school year and an opportunity to look back as summer moves into fall. During this year, important changes were made to the Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct and the Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement relating to the way attorneys handle client money, either in Interest on Lawyers' Trust Accounts or trusts. These rules were amended because the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania felt that, while the Office of Disciplinary Counsel could adequately investigate and litigate cases of embezzlement and theft, the board's ability to identify and prevent these crimes needed to be strengthened.
The amendment of the rules was motivated by the board's desire to ensure that dishonesty could be stopped before a client was injured beyond the attorney's ability to make restitution. The board, which regularly reviews the information it collects and looks for trends, noticed that a significant number of cases included facts where the attorney held a client's money to “protect” it or created a trust, with the attorney acting as trustee. In some cases, the trust money was never deposited into an account and no banks were involved as a safety net. In other instances, the attorneys misled banks through forgery of documents. The board also looked at cases where attorneys provided investment advice to clients or purchased investment vehicles for them that subsequently failed.
In response to the investment issue, the Disciplinary Board drafted Rule of Professional Conduct 5.8. The rule provides that a lawyer who provides investment services must be licensed to do so and should not recommend any investment vehicle in which the lawyer himself or herself has an interest. This conflict of interest is not imputed to other members of the firm, but applies to any lawyer whether or not he or she is providing “legal services.”
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1A&O Shearman Adopts 3-Level Lockstep Pay Model Amid Shift to All-Equity Partnership
- 2A RICO Surge Is Underway: Here's How the Allstate Push Might Play Out
- 3The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 4Data-Driven Legal Strategies
- 5Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250