PaLaw 2016: Annual Report on the Legal Profession
Welcome to the 23rd edition of PaLaw: Annual Report on the Legal Profession. As is the case every year, our aim with this magazine is to thoroughly encapsulate the past year in the Pennsylvania legal community.
December 13, 2016 at 10:55 AM
14 minute read
Editor's Note: Welcome to the 23rd edition of PaLaw: Annual Report on the Legal Profession. As is the case every year, our aim with this magazine is to thoroughly encapsulate the past year in the Pennsylvania legal community.
We often say in our newsroom that our number one job is giving readers information that will help them to be better lawyers. By providing an in-depth analysis of the past nearly 12 months in the profession, our hope is that looking backward will allow our readers to glean insights that can help guide them as they forge ahead into the coming year.
There's a lot to dive into here, including our annual 100 Largest Law Firms rankings and top Pennsylvania verdicts and settlements features.
But first, I'd just like to take a moment to thank everyone who put so much hard work into this magazine.
For Kristie Rearick, our magazines and supplements editor, this was her first year at the helm of this project and she threw herself into the role. Meanwhile, as he has for so many years, Brian Harris, our director of information and technology, managed the various databases of survey results we receive, which then get turned into the charts and graphs throughout the magazine. Gina Passarella, our former senior staff reporter who now leads ALM's national business of law desk, lent her wisdom and experience throughout the process of putting this publication together and contributed a thoughtful, informative piece providing context to and analysis of the results of our annual Managing Partners Survey.
And, of course, we couldn't do this without you, the reader. It's your input, through survey responses and interviews all year, that provides the foundation for this publication and we sincerely thank you for that. With PaLaw, we strive to put out a magazine that is indispensable to attorneys and we continually try to improve the reader experience based on the feedback we receive. With that in mind, please feel free to share your input on the magazine with us. We look forward to working with you in 2017 and for many more years to come.
- Firm Financials 2015: Weak Demand at Some Firms Makes for Uneven Fiscal 2015
- Managing Partners Survey: A Big-Money Balancing Act
CHARTS
Corrections to the Print Editon:
The “100 Largest Law Firms in Pennsylvania” listing in PaLaw magazine should have noted Bennett, Bricklin & Saltzburg as having 71 attorneys in Pennsylvania, representing a gain of 16 lawyers from the previous year and placing them at number 37 on the list. In addition, the firm should have been included among the “Fastest-Growing Firms” on page 63.
The “100 Largest Law Firms in Pennsylvania” listing in PaLaw magazine should have noted Barley Snyder as having 71 attorneys in Pennsylvania, representing a gain of 10 lawyers from the previous year and placing them at number 37 (tied with Bennett Bricklin) on the list. In addition, the firm should have been included among the “Fastest-Growing Firms” on page 63.
The “100 Largest Law Firms in Pennsylvania” listing in PaLaw magazine should have noted Elliott Greenleaf as having 48 attorneys in Pennsylvania placing them at number 47 on the list. In addition, the firm should not have appeared on the “Fastest-Shrinking Firms” chart on page 63.
The “100 Largest Law Firms in Pennsylvania” listing in PaLaw magazine should have noted Montgomery McCracken Walker & Rhoads as having 82 attorneys in Pennsylvania placing them at number 27 on the list. In addition, the firm should have appeared at number 10 on the Fastest-Shrinking Firms chart.
The “Largest Awards & Settlements in Pa.” listing in PaLaw magazine should have included in the number 2 spot the $44.1 million verdict in Tate v. The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania obtained by plaintiffs attorney Robert Ross of Ross Feller Casey in Philadelphia. In Tate, a Philadelphia jury found that the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania failed to recognize a woman's adverse reaction to anti-coagulant medication before she suffered a brain hemorrhage.
The “100 Largest Law Firms” listing also should have included Malvern and Harrisburg; Washington, D.C.; and Chicago among the office locations for Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young.
Editor's Note: Welcome to the 23rd edition of PaLaw: Annual Report on the Legal Profession. As is the case every year, our aim with this magazine is to thoroughly encapsulate the past year in the Pennsylvania legal community.
We often say in our newsroom that our number one job is giving readers information that will help them to be better lawyers. By providing an in-depth analysis of the past nearly 12 months in the profession, our hope is that looking backward will allow our readers to glean insights that can help guide them as they forge ahead into the coming year.
There's a lot to dive into here, including our annual 100 Largest Law Firms rankings and top Pennsylvania verdicts and settlements features.
But first, I'd just like to take a moment to thank everyone who put so much hard work into this magazine.
For Kristie Rearick, our magazines and supplements editor, this was her first year at the helm of this project and she threw herself into the role. Meanwhile, as he has for so many years, Brian Harris, our director of information and technology, managed the various databases of survey results we receive, which then get turned into the charts and graphs throughout the magazine. Gina Passarella, our former senior staff reporter who now leads ALM's national business of law desk, lent her wisdom and experience throughout the process of putting this publication together and contributed a thoughtful, informative piece providing context to and analysis of the results of our annual Managing Partners Survey.
And, of course, we couldn't do this without you, the reader. It's your input, through survey responses and interviews all year, that provides the foundation for this publication and we sincerely thank you for that. With PaLaw, we strive to put out a magazine that is indispensable to attorneys and we continually try to improve the reader experience based on the feedback we receive. With that in mind, please feel free to share your input on the magazine with us. We look forward to working with you in 2017 and for many more years to come.
- Firm Financials 2015: Weak Demand at Some Firms Makes for Uneven Fiscal 2015
- Managing Partners Survey: A Big-Money Balancing Act
CHARTS
Corrections to the Print Editon:
The “100 Largest Law Firms in Pennsylvania” listing in PaLaw magazine should have noted
The “100 Largest Law Firms in Pennsylvania” listing in PaLaw magazine should have noted
The “100 Largest Law Firms in Pennsylvania” listing in PaLaw magazine should have noted
The “100 Largest Law Firms in Pennsylvania” listing in PaLaw magazine should have noted
The “Largest Awards & Settlements in Pa.” listing in PaLaw magazine should have included in the number 2 spot the $44.1 million verdict in Tate v. The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania obtained by plaintiffs attorney Robert Ross of
The “100 Largest Law Firms” listing also should have included Malvern and Harrisburg; Washington, D.C.; and Chicago among the office locations for
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawyers for Dechert, Ex-Partners Urge SDNY Judge to Dismiss RICO Complaint
UPDATED: Dechert Reaches Multimillion Dollar Settlement for Aviation Entrepreneur's UK Hacking Claims
Trending Stories
- 1Trump Taps Former Fla. Attorney General for AG
- 2Newsom Names Two Judges to Appellate Courts in San Francisco, Orange County
- 3Biden Has Few Ways to Protect His Environmental Legacy, Say Lawyers, Advocates
- 4UN Treaty Enacting Cybercrime Standards Likely to Face Headwinds in US, Other Countries
- 5Clark Hill Acquires L&E Boutique in Mexico City, Adding 5 Lawyers
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250