PaLaw 2016: Annual Report on the Legal Profession
Welcome to the 23rd edition of PaLaw: Annual Report on the Legal Profession. As is the case every year, our aim with this magazine is to thoroughly encapsulate the past year in the Pennsylvania legal community.
December 13, 2016 at 10:55 AM
14 minute read
Editor's Note: Welcome to the 23rd edition of PaLaw: Annual Report on the Legal Profession. As is the case every year, our aim with this magazine is to thoroughly encapsulate the past year in the Pennsylvania legal community.
We often say in our newsroom that our number one job is giving readers information that will help them to be better lawyers. By providing an in-depth analysis of the past nearly 12 months in the profession, our hope is that looking backward will allow our readers to glean insights that can help guide them as they forge ahead into the coming year.
There's a lot to dive into here, including our annual 100 Largest Law Firms rankings and top Pennsylvania verdicts and settlements features.
But first, I'd just like to take a moment to thank everyone who put so much hard work into this magazine.
For Kristie Rearick, our magazines and supplements editor, this was her first year at the helm of this project and she threw herself into the role. Meanwhile, as he has for so many years, Brian Harris, our director of information and technology, managed the various databases of survey results we receive, which then get turned into the charts and graphs throughout the magazine. Gina Passarella, our former senior staff reporter who now leads ALM's national business of law desk, lent her wisdom and experience throughout the process of putting this publication together and contributed a thoughtful, informative piece providing context to and analysis of the results of our annual Managing Partners Survey.
And, of course, we couldn't do this without you, the reader. It's your input, through survey responses and interviews all year, that provides the foundation for this publication and we sincerely thank you for that. With PaLaw, we strive to put out a magazine that is indispensable to attorneys and we continually try to improve the reader experience based on the feedback we receive. With that in mind, please feel free to share your input on the magazine with us. We look forward to working with you in 2017 and for many more years to come.
- Firm Financials 2015: Weak Demand at Some Firms Makes for Uneven Fiscal 2015
- Managing Partners Survey: A Big-Money Balancing Act
CHARTS
- Top 100 Law Firms in Pennsylvania by Size
- Top Verdicts in Pennsylvania
- Fastest Growing Firms (Number)
- Fastest Growing Firms (Percentage)
- Fastest Shrinking Firms (Number)
- Fastest Shrinking Firms (Percentage)
Click Here to View the Digital Edition of PaLaw 2016
Corrections to the Print Editon:
The “100 Largest Law Firms in Pennsylvania” listing in PaLaw magazine should have noted Bennett, Bricklin & Saltzburg as having 71 attorneys in Pennsylvania, representing a gain of 16 lawyers from the previous year and placing them at number 37 on the list. In addition, the firm should have been included among the “Fastest-Growing Firms” on page 63.
The “100 Largest Law Firms in Pennsylvania” listing in PaLaw magazine should have noted Barley Snyder as having 71 attorneys in Pennsylvania, representing a gain of 10 lawyers from the previous year and placing them at number 37 (tied with Bennett Bricklin) on the list. In addition, the firm should have been included among the “Fastest-Growing Firms” on page 63.
The “100 Largest Law Firms in Pennsylvania” listing in PaLaw magazine should have noted Elliott Greenleaf as having 48 attorneys in Pennsylvania placing them at number 47 on the list. In addition, the firm should not have appeared on the “Fastest-Shrinking Firms” chart on page 63.
The “100 Largest Law Firms in Pennsylvania” listing in PaLaw magazine should have noted Montgomery McCracken Walker & Rhoads as having 82 attorneys in Pennsylvania placing them at number 27 on the list. In addition, the firm should have appeared at number 10 on the Fastest-Shrinking Firms chart.
The “Largest Awards & Settlements in Pa.” listing in PaLaw magazine should have included in the number 2 spot the $44.1 million verdict in Tate v. The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania obtained by plaintiffs attorney Robert Ross of Ross Feller Casey in Philadelphia. In Tate, a Philadelphia jury found that the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania failed to recognize a woman's adverse reaction to anti-coagulant medication before she suffered a brain hemorrhage.
The “100 Largest Law Firms” listing also should have included Malvern and Harrisburg; Washington, D.C.; and Chicago among the office locations for Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young.
Editor's Note: Welcome to the 23rd edition of PaLaw: Annual Report on the Legal Profession. As is the case every year, our aim with this magazine is to thoroughly encapsulate the past year in the Pennsylvania legal community.
We often say in our newsroom that our number one job is giving readers information that will help them to be better lawyers. By providing an in-depth analysis of the past nearly 12 months in the profession, our hope is that looking backward will allow our readers to glean insights that can help guide them as they forge ahead into the coming year.
There's a lot to dive into here, including our annual 100 Largest Law Firms rankings and top Pennsylvania verdicts and settlements features.
But first, I'd just like to take a moment to thank everyone who put so much hard work into this magazine.
For Kristie Rearick, our magazines and supplements editor, this was her first year at the helm of this project and she threw herself into the role. Meanwhile, as he has for so many years, Brian Harris, our director of information and technology, managed the various databases of survey results we receive, which then get turned into the charts and graphs throughout the magazine. Gina Passarella, our former senior staff reporter who now leads ALM's national business of law desk, lent her wisdom and experience throughout the process of putting this publication together and contributed a thoughtful, informative piece providing context to and analysis of the results of our annual Managing Partners Survey.
And, of course, we couldn't do this without you, the reader. It's your input, through survey responses and interviews all year, that provides the foundation for this publication and we sincerely thank you for that. With PaLaw, we strive to put out a magazine that is indispensable to attorneys and we continually try to improve the reader experience based on the feedback we receive. With that in mind, please feel free to share your input on the magazine with us. We look forward to working with you in 2017 and for many more years to come.
- Firm Financials 2015: Weak Demand at Some Firms Makes for Uneven Fiscal 2015
- Managing Partners Survey: A Big-Money Balancing Act
CHARTS
- Top 100 Law Firms in Pennsylvania by Size
- Top Verdicts in Pennsylvania
- Fastest Growing Firms (Number)
- Fastest Growing Firms (Percentage)
- Fastest Shrinking Firms (Number)
- Fastest Shrinking Firms (Percentage)
Click Here to View the Digital Edition of PaLaw 2016
Corrections to the Print Editon:
The “100 Largest Law Firms in Pennsylvania” listing in PaLaw magazine should have noted
The “100 Largest Law Firms in Pennsylvania” listing in PaLaw magazine should have noted
The “100 Largest Law Firms in Pennsylvania” listing in PaLaw magazine should have noted
The “100 Largest Law Firms in Pennsylvania” listing in PaLaw magazine should have noted
The “Largest Awards & Settlements in Pa.” listing in PaLaw magazine should have included in the number 2 spot the $44.1 million verdict in Tate v. The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania obtained by plaintiffs attorney Robert Ross of
The “100 Largest Law Firms” listing also should have included Malvern and Harrisburg; Washington, D.C.; and Chicago among the office locations for
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAI's Place in Big Law Broadens, As Firms Embrace Fresh Uses of the Technology
Trending Stories
- 1Gunderson Dettmer Opens Atlanta Office With 3 Partners From Morris Manning
- 2Decision of the Day: Court Holds Accident with Post Driver Was 'Bizarre Occurrence,' Dismisses Action Brought Under Labor Law §240
- 3Judge Recommends Disbarment for Attorney Who Plotted to Hack Judge's Email, Phone
- 4Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 5Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250