A judge’s ruling that Audi is not entitled to discovery of 54 documents in its breach of contract case against a northeastern Pennsylvania dealership has shed light on the scope of the common interest privilege.
U.S. Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson of the Middle District of Pennsylvania denied Audi’s request to compel production of discovery from defendant Bronsberg & Hughes Pontiac Inc., doing business as Wyoming Valley Audi, finding that the documents in question were protected by the attorney-client and common interest privileges.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
