Technology Is Overpowering the Very Human Profession of Law
I saw an article about the increased use of artificial intelligence in the future of the practice of law. The article suggested that lawyers who are not technologically skilled ought to retire or consider another profession. Where is the practice of law headed?
June 08, 2017 at 05:37 AM
31 minute read
Technology is overpowering the very human profession of law.
I saw an article about the increased use of artificial intelligence in the future of the practice of law. The article suggested that lawyers who are not technologically skilled ought to retire or consider another profession. Where is the practice of law headed?
The article you referred to was published in the American Bar Association's Law Journal. It spoke of the coming future of artificial intelligence that can assist lawyers. It ended with the ominous statement that older lawyers who do not like or are not technologically advanced should look forward to their retirement or something to that effect.
Sometimes it is important just to stand still for a second, look at the nature of what the legal profession is supposed to be and then look at where and how technology has advanced the legal profession—or not advanced it. Clearly, since 1993 or 1994 forward, technology has radically changed the way law is practiced. The changes have resulted in the ability to have instant communication, the ability to forward large documents and materials, the ability to access and work at any place at any time and at any location as long as one carries a computer or laptop or even a smartphone. It has replaced the old running for a telephone booth during breaks in trials or looking for gas stations that had phone booths when traveling. For many lawyers and firms, it has replaced having a trusted secretary. It has reduced the number of office staff dramatically, though not necessarily for the better. It has equaled the playing field in terms of access to information. The days when big firm libraries had an advantage are gone as long as one can afford Lexis or Westlaw. Those programs can provide unlimited information almost instantaneously. It has changed the nature of trials. Trials now more and more are becoming technological shows. Documents are put up on a screen and reviewed by jurors. Even opening or closing speeches are all often shows of technology with photographs or evidence or written portions of the closing speech put before the jury. The counsel table in many courtrooms is filled with computer terminals and laptops. Instead of paper, many lawyers have everything on their computer and access it. Even oral arguments are different. Many judges have laptops or computers on the bench. Many arguments are spent watching judges type and oftentimes it's difficult to even see their faces. Filing documents now can be done instantaneously. There is no need to walk to the courthouse or run in at the last moment to have a filing meet the deadline. Discovery is often given on disk and with computers there is so much discovery sometimes that law firms have to hire special IT people to organize it.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLackawanna County Lawyer Fails to Shake Legal Mal Claims Over Sex With Client
3 minute readCourt Sanctions Attorney $7.5K for Filing Repeated Erroneous Complaints
5 minute readFormer Sacks Weston Partner Faces 5-Year Suspension Over Mail, Wire Fraud Conviction
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250