Prima Facie Case • Preliminary Hearing • Hearsay Evidence

Commonwealth v. McClelland, PICS Case No. 17-0884 (Pa. Super May 26, 2017) Bowes, J.; (30 pages).

Defendant’s inability to cross-examine his primary accuser at a preliminary hearing did not violate his due process rights since the preliminary hearing procedure must simply provide adequate notice, the opportunity to be heard and the chance to defend oneself. The court affirmed an order denying defendant’s motion for a writ of habeas corpus.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]