Mark Hershey Farms, Inc. v. Robinson, PICS Case No. 17-0889 (Pa. Super. May 25, 2017) Dubow, J. (10 pages).
Doctrine of piercing the corporate veil could not be extended to the sole heir of an estate which possessed the equity interests of a corporation, where the estate administration had not yet been completed and the interests had not yet passed to the heir. Judgment reversed.
June 17, 2017 at 12:00 AM
6 minute read
Breach • Unjust Enrichment • Piercing of the Corporate Veil • Subject Matter Jurisdiction over Estate Matters
Mark Hershey Farms, Inc. v. Robinson, PICS Case No. 17-0889 (Pa. Super. May 25, 2017) Dubow, J. (10 pages).
Doctrine of piercing the corporate veil could not be extended to the sole heir of an estate which possessed the equity interests of a corporation, where the estate administration had not yet been completed and the interests had not yet passed to the heir. Judgment reversed.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: For Big Law Names, Shorter is Sweeter
- 2Wine, Dine and Grind (Through the Weekend): Summer Associates Thirst For Experience in 'Real Matters'
- 3'That's Disappointing': Only 11% of MDL Appointments Went to Attorneys of Color in 2023
- 4What We Know About the Kentucky Judge Killed in His Chambers
- 5'I'm Staying Everything': Texas Bankruptcy Judge Halts Talc Trials Against J&J
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250