Yocum v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control Bd., PICS Case No. 17-0856 (Pa. May 25, 2017) Dougherty, J.; Wecht, J., concurring and dissenting. (44 pages).
Gaming Act's prohibition on seeking employment with gaming licensees, applications, or entities that represented them was not unconstitutional infringement on Pennsylvania Supreme Court's exclusive authority. Petition for review dismissed with prejudice.
June 17, 2017 at 12:00 AM
6 minute read
Gaming Act • Prohibition on Employment with Gaming Applicants • Constitutionality • Standing/Ripeness of Claim
Yocum v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control Bd., PICS Case No. 17-0856 (Pa. May 25, 2017) Dougherty, J.; Wecht, J., concurring and dissenting. (44 pages).
Gaming Act's prohibition on seeking employment with gaming licensees, applications, or entities that represented them was not unconstitutional infringement on Pennsylvania Supreme Court's exclusive authority. Petition for review dismissed with prejudice.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: For Big Law Names, Shorter is Sweeter
- 2Wine, Dine and Grind (Through the Weekend): Summer Associates Thirst For Experience in 'Real Matters'
- 3'That's Disappointing': Only 11% of MDL Appointments Went to Attorneys of Color in 2023
- 4What We Know About the Kentucky Judge Killed in His Chambers
- 5'I'm Staying Everything': Texas Bankruptcy Judge Halts Talc Trials Against J&J
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
