Equitable Distribution • Marital Asset • Tax Implications of Asset Sale
Carney v. Carney, PICS Case No. 17-0944 (Pa. Super. May 31, 2017) Stevens, J. (16 pages).
The trial court erred in failing to consider evidence related to the potential sale of the parties’ successful trucking business before assigning the entire asset to husband as part of the equitable distribution of the parties’ marital estate. The appellate court affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded for further proceedings.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
