Confession of Judgment • Petition to Open and/or Strike • Timeliness • Meritorious Defense
Lechowicz v. Moser, PICS Case No. 17-0959 (Pa. Super. May 31, 2017) Ransom, J. (11 pages).
Trial court erred in holding that appellant’s petition to open and/or stay a judgment was time-barred because there was no notice of execution and the promptness requirement of rule 2959 did not attach but appellant’s argument that the note constituted an extension of credit by appellee lacked merit and his bald assertion that the legal fees involved were unreasonable did not provide the basis for a meritorious defense. Affirmed.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
