A divided Pennsylvania Supreme Court has rejected a Stroudsburg lawyer's argument that he doesn't deserve disbarment for mishandling funds belonging to five of his clients.

The court ruled 5-2 to adopt a recommendation by the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania that Peter J. Quigley be disbarred.

Justice Sallie Updyke Mundy, writing for the majority, said Quigley's arguments that he did not possess criminal intent in mishandling the funds and that all of his clients have since been paid in full were unavailing.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Go To Lexis →

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Go To Bloomberg Law →

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

NOT FOR REPRINT