It's Time to Revamp the PCRA Appointment System
I am on the Philadelphia court-appointed list and have not signed up to do PCRAs, but I was still appointed on a PCRA case and might be appointed on a second one. I immediately declined the appointment, but was told I was not allowed to do so. Can I ethically decline the appointment?
June 29, 2017 at 04:13 PM
16 minute read
Editor's note: The court issued an order June 26 outlining a new fee schedule and setting rules and procedures for conflict counsel attorneys to recover their fees. The order was issued after the First Judicial District's Administrative Governing Board convened a special committee to review conflict counsel fees.
It's time to revamp the PCRA appointment system.
I am on the Philadelphia court-appointed list and have not signed up to do PCRAs, but I was still appointed on a PCRA case and might be appointed on a second one. I immediately declined the appointment, but was told I was not allowed to do so. Can I ethically decline the appointment?
The Philadelphia court system has been bogged down with numerous post-conviction hearing relief petitions filed by pro se petitioners. There are some lawyers who have asked to be appointed on PCRA cases, but they are quickly overwhelmed with the work. It's a very dangerous situation for a lawyer to be in. PCRAs take a lot of time and effort. Yet, the payment system is very poor. When one submits a fee petition, it is normally cut sometimes substantially. The biggest problem is one can't be timely paid. There are two payment times. First, after the PCRA is denied, which could take a year or two. One can then submit a petition. That will be reviewed and will take eight months to a year before that's approved and usually cut. The payment time is when one appeals the PCRA petition denial. That process could take another two years and there is no payment until the entire appellate process is completed. And then, again, it takes about six months to a year or more for approval and the fee is often cut.
In some of the counties, compensation of the PCRA is not much better. There are court-appointed lawyers in the counties who receive a flat fee no matter how many cases they receive. There are some counties that have one court-appointed counsel for PCRAs. It makes it almost impossible to handle the cases and do them correctly and diligently.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Lackawanna County Lawyer Fails to Shake Legal Mal Claims Over Sex With Client Lackawanna County Lawyer Fails to Shake Legal Mal Claims Over Sex With Client](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2024/09/Lackawanna-County-Courthouse-767x633-4.jpg)
Lackawanna County Lawyer Fails to Shake Legal Mal Claims Over Sex With Client
3 minute read![Court Sanctions Attorney $7.5K for Filing Repeated Erroneous Complaints Court Sanctions Attorney $7.5K for Filing Repeated Erroneous Complaints](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2022/10/Attorney-Discipline-767x633-2.jpg)
Court Sanctions Attorney $7.5K for Filing Repeated Erroneous Complaints
5 minute read![Matt's Corner: Legal Malpractice as It Relates to Ethical Violations Matt's Corner: Legal Malpractice as It Relates to Ethical Violations](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2022/01/Matthew-Weisberg-767x633.jpg)
![Former Sacks Weston Partner Faces 5-Year Suspension Over Mail, Wire Fraud Conviction Former Sacks Weston Partner Faces 5-Year Suspension Over Mail, Wire Fraud Conviction](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2024/04/Disbarred-lawyer-767x633.jpg)
Former Sacks Weston Partner Faces 5-Year Suspension Over Mail, Wire Fraud Conviction
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250