Patent Litigation • Antitrust Litigation • Admissibility • Prejudice • ‘Actavis’ Rule of Reason
Apotex, Inc. v. Cephalon, Inc., PICS Case No. 17-0987 (E.D. Pa. June 8, 2107) Goldberg, J. (20 pages).
The court found that findings of patent invalidity and noninfringement made after reverse-payment settlement agreements were irrelevant to the rule of reason analysis in plaintiff's antitrust litigation but were relevant to plaintiff's antitrust causation showing and were admissible and the court ordered a two phase trial to limit prejudice and jury confusion. Two phase trial ordered.
June 30, 2017 at 01:37 PM
1 minute read
Patent Litigation • Antitrust Litigation • Admissibility • Prejudice • ‘Actavis’ Rule of Reason
Apotex, Inc. v. Cephalon, Inc., PICS Case No. 17-0987 (E.D. Pa. June 8, 2107) Goldberg, J. (20 pages).
Presented by BigVoodoo
GlobeSt. Women of Influence Conference celebrates the women who drive the commercial real estate industry forward.
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.
The University of New Mexico (UNM) (https://www.unm.edu/) is seeking nominations, inquiries, and applications for the position of General Co...
Maslon LLP is seeking attorney candidates with 4-6 years of experience to join its Insurance Coverage Team. Maslon s Insurance Recovery Grou...
New York-based indie music company seeks full-time litigation attorney. Must have 2 years music business experience. Must be admitted to S...