Motion to Suppress Evidence • Juvenile • Search Warrant Exceptions
In the Interest of RK, PICS Case No. 17-0929 (C.P. Lycoming Jun. 8, 2017) McCoy, J. (6 pages).
Evidence of drug paraphernalia obtained from a warrantless search of a juvenile’s backpack was inadmissible, because the juvenile did not consent to the search and none of the search warrant exceptions applied. The court granted the juvenile’s motion to suppress.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
