Mishandling of Client Funds • Mitigation • Disbarment
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Quigley, PICS Case No. 17-1052 (Pa. June 20, 2017) Mundy, J., Donohue, J. (dissenting) (19 pages).
Court agreed with board that petitioner had to be disbarred for mishandling the funds of five clients over a three-year period because the court was not persuaded by petitioner’s arguments for mitigation and, while petitioner cooperated with the disciplinary process, he did not make restitution to four of his clients until after the disciplinary process was instituted. Board recommendation adopted and petitioner was disbarred.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
